SERIGO is undertaking an analysis of 24 case studies on social and solidarity economy (SSE) solutions implemented in diverse local contexts across 12 countries. These studies aim to shed light on the framework conditions that lead to social exclusion, as well as the drivers and the potential of social innovation in addressing the challenges faced by vulnerable groups.
By exploring these case studies, SERIGO contributes to its overarching goal: to examine the role, capacity, and limitations of social and solidarity economy in enhancing the inclusion of vulnerable populations in rural areas.
SERIGO’s case studies cover a multidimensional diversity of rurality and vulnerabilities, as well as institutionalization and longevity.
For instance, Somos Red, a citizen-led initiative advocating dignified livelihoods for migrant communities in Tenerife (Spain), has been operating since 2020 and is organised in a more informal structure.
In contrast, the House of Solidarity, which promotes housing access and autonomy for vulnerable individuals in the Eisack Valley, South Tyrol (Italy), has been active for over 20 years and is more formally organised.
SERIGO also addresses various forms of vulnerability across different groups. Some of the case studies focus on former inmates, while others explore the experiences of older adults, survivors of gender-based violence, or seasonal agricultural workers and their families.
Based on in-depth empirical knowledge and cross-case analysis, SERIGO’s case studies will form the basis for the construction of a grounded theory. This will provide a structured understanding of the links and interactions between rural vulnerabilities and the socially innovative solutions implemented by social economy initiatives.
Key visions of the case studies
To ensure a multidimensional approach to recognising and analysing vulnerabilities, a new framework has been introduced: Intersectional Critical Systems Thinking (ICST).
This approach combines the principles of intersectionality and critical systems thinking, both of which focus on the complexity of social systems and the role of power dynamics in shaping inclusion and exclusion.
ICST highlights how interconnected factors and feedback loops contribute to marginalisation, vulnerability, and inequality, and, conversely, inclusion and resilience.
Building on this framework, the initiatives have been categorised based on the type of vision that guides their activities. The resulting clusters are:
- Alternative economic models: To enhance service provision in rural areas.
- Social justice and inclusion: To promote social justice and foster inclusion for marginalized groups.
- Community building and cohesion: To strengthen community ties and build cohesion.
- Holistic health and sustainability: To encourage healthy and sustainable practices.
- Democracy and participation: To empower communities through increased participation and enhanced democratic practices
SERIGO’s analysis will provide actionable insights into how social and solidarity economy initiatives can address rural vulnerabilities. The findings will also help identify best- practices and frameworks that other communities can adapt to their unique contexts.
Next steps
Starting in early 2025, the SERIGO case study team will begin fieldwork across 24 case studies, which will take 12 months to complete. To stay connected and support cross-case analysis, all teams will meet regularly to share updates on their research.
In 2026, each team will write a report on their case study. These reports will form the basis of a cross-case analysis, with the final results expected by mid-2027.
Discover more about the SERIGO case studies and their transformative potential: Visit here the SERIGO Case Studies.